Kentucky 2022 Regular Session

Kentucky House Bill HB669

Introduced
2/28/22  
Refer
2/28/22  
Refer
3/2/22  
Report Pass
3/10/22  
Engrossed
3/18/22  
Refer
3/18/22  
Refer
3/21/22  
Report Pass
3/29/22  
Enrolled
3/30/22  
Enrolled
3/30/22  
Chaptered
4/8/22  

Caption

AN ACT relating to oil and gas, making an appropriation therefor, and declaring an emergency.

Impact

The implementation of HB669 is expected to have significant impacts on state laws governing oil and gas operations. By providing a framework for identifying eligible abandoned wells and storage tanks, the bill enhances the authority of the Department for Natural Resources to manage these abandoned sites more effectively. Moreover, it aims to address the urgent need for proper waste management in contexts where legacy infrastructure still poses risks, potentially leading to more stringent enforcement of environmental standards in the oil and gas sector.

Summary

House Bill 669 seeks to address the reclamation of abandoned storage tank facilities and orphaned oil and gas wells in Kentucky. The bill establishes the Kentucky Abandoned Storage Tank and Orphan Well Reclamation Program, which aims to remediate, reclaim, and ensure the safe closure of facilities and wells that threaten public health and the environment. It specifies the processes by which abandoned facilities can be cleaned and secured, reiterating the importance of protecting natural resources and community safety against hazards posed by such sites.

Sentiment

The bill has garnered a generally positive sentiment, with recognition from environmental advocacy groups and public health officials who emphasize the necessity of addressing orphan wells and abandoned storage tanks. Supporters argue that successful implementation of the reclamation program is vital for public safety and the environment. However, the bill could face some contention from stakeholders concerned about funding sources and the administrative capabilities of the Department to handle the increased responsibilities.

Contention

Despite the general agreement on the necessity of the bill, potential points of contention include the adequacy of the funding allocated to the reclamation program and concerns about the practicality of execution. As the program depends on the establishment of a dedicated fund financed through state and federal grants, there could be debates over budget allocation and long-term sustainability. Lawmakers and community stakeholders will likely discuss the best practices for utilizing these funds efficiently to ensure the targeted remediation of the most urgent sites.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1125

Oil and gas: alternative to bond requirement: financial accounts.

KS HB2525

Providing for additional sources of revenue for the water program management fund and creating additional fees for the regulation of underground injection control wells.

KS HB2159

Providing for additional sources of revenue for the water program management fund and creating additional fees for the regulation of underground injection control wells.

CA AB355

Water pollution: enforcement.

CA SB465

Property Assessed Clean Energy Program: wildfire safety improvements.

AZ SB1660

Water; storage; effluent; credits

CA SB467

Expert witnesses: writ of habeas corpus.

MS SB2650

Waters of the state; amend the definition of.