Kentucky Senate Bill SR10

Kentucky 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/4/22
• Failed: 1/6/22

Caption

A RESOLUTION designating January 22, 2022, as the Day of Tears.

Impact

The passage of SR10 has implications for state laws and societal values as it reflects and reinforces anti-abortion sentiments within the legislature. While it does not change any laws directly, it serves as a formal acknowledgment from the state government of the consequences of abortion, influencing public perception and potentially motivating legislative action regarding reproductive rights in Kentucky. The resolution thus symbolizes a societal stance against abortion and aims to instigate further discussions on the topic.

Summary

SR10 is a resolution designating January 22, 2022, as the Day of Tears in Kentucky. This resolution commemorates the anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision that established abortion as a constitutional right in 1973, which advocates cite as leading to the death of over 62 million unborn children. The bill encourages citizens to express their mourning by lowering their flags to half-staff on this day in remembrance of those who have lost their lives to abortion. By doing so, the resolution aims to raise awareness about the issue and promote a sense of collective grief and reflection among Kentuckians.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SR10 is supportive among proponents of the anti-abortion movement, viewing the resolution as a necessary step in honoring the lives lost due to abortion. Supporters argue that recognizing a Day of Tears will aid in educating the public and affirming the values of life and family. Conversely, critics of the resolution may view it as a divisive act that politicizes personal and medical choices, reflecting broader conflicts in societal attitudes towards reproductive rights.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the implications of designating a day specifically to mourn abortion. Supporters argue it formalizes recognition of the lives lost and fosters a societal shift towards valuing unborn children. However, opponents criticize it as a politicization of personal health decisions and an infringement on reproductive rights. These debates highlight the ongoing national discourse regarding abortion and the varying opinions on how such issues should be commemorated or discussed within legislative contexts.