AN ACT relating to automated license plate readers.
The bill includes stipulations regarding the retention of data captured by ALPRs, mandating that it must not be held for longer than 90 days unless used as evidence in prosecutions or administrative investigations. This aspect is intended to protect the privacy rights of individuals, ensuring that their data is not kept indefinitely without justification. Additionally, it prohibits the sale of licensed data for profit, further affirming the intent to safeguard public trust in law enforcement practices.
SB129 establishes regulations surrounding the deployment and operation of automated license plate readers (ALPR) in Kentucky. This bill defines an ALPR as a system employing high-speed cameras and algorithms to convert images of license plates into usable data. The legislation specifies that only certain entities, such as law enforcement agencies and the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, are permitted to operate ALPRs with specified purposes, primarily focused on public safety and law enforcement activities. The bill emphasizes the role of technology in modern policing while aiming to address privacy concerns related to surveillance practices.
Overall sentiment regarding SB129 appears to be cautiously supportive among proponents of law enforcement and public safety, who believe that regulated use of ALPR technology can significantly aid in crime prevention and resolution. Conversely, privacy advocates express concern over potential misuse and the implications of expanded surveillance capabilities, advocating for stronger privacy protections. This reflects a broader societal dialogue about balancing safety with civil liberties.
Notable points of contention include the effectiveness of the 90-day data retention limit and the conditions under which the data can be accessed or shared between entities. Critics argue that any use of automated surveillance tools carries inherent risks of infringing on individual rights, while supporters assert that the bill provides necessary oversight and accountability. The discussions around SB129 emphasize the ongoing debate over the integration of technology in policing and the need for clear guidelines to avoid potential overreach.