Kentucky 2024 Regular Session

Kentucky House Bill HB166

Introduced
1/5/24  
Refer
1/5/24  
Refer
1/24/24  
Report Pass
2/1/24  
Engrossed
2/7/24  
Refer
2/7/24  
Refer
3/14/24  
Report Pass
3/22/24  
Enrolled
3/28/24  
Enrolled
3/28/24  
Chaptered
4/5/24  

Caption

AN ACT relating to sudden unexpected death in epilepsy.

Impact

The bill's implementation will create new requirements for healthcare providers in terms of informing patients about the potential risks of SUDEP. Additionally, it obligates coroners to adopt new protocols when conducting autopsies on individuals with epileptic concerns. By doing so, the legislation aims to better understand the cases of SUDEP within the state and support the North American SUDEP Registry through improved data collection, therefore enhancing public health outcomes related to epilepsy.

Summary

House Bill 166, also known as Jami's Law, aims to enhance awareness and reporting regarding Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP). The bill encourages healthcare providers to inform patients diagnosed with convulsive epilepsy about the risks and preventive measures related to SUDEP. It mandates that if requested by a family member, autopsies conducted in Kentucky must include inquiries to determine if a death was a result of a seizure or related to epilepsy, with appropriate documentation on death certificates indicating SUDEP as the cause if applicable.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 166 appears largely supportive among legislators and advocates for epilepsy awareness. Lawmakers recognize the importance of both patient education and accurate death reporting to contribute to better insights into SUDEP and its prevalence. Advocacy groups and medical professionals emphasize that comprehensive understanding and education on SUDEP can lead to improved patient safety and prevention strategies.

Contention

Despite general support, some concerns have been raised regarding the administrative burden this bill may impose on healthcare providers and coroners. Specifically, questions about how efficiently such requirements can be integrated into existing practices and whether additional state funding or resources are necessary to support these new obligations. How this bill harmonizes with existing health initiatives has also been an area of discussion among detractors.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.