Kentucky 2024 Regular Session

Kentucky House Bill HB386

Introduced
1/25/24  
Refer
1/25/24  
Refer
1/31/24  
Report Pass
2/7/24  
Engrossed
2/13/24  
Refer
2/13/24  
Refer
2/20/24  
Report Pass
3/13/24  
Enrolled
3/27/24  
Enrolled
3/27/24  
Chaptered
4/9/24  

Caption

AN ACT relating to purchase limits for pseudoephedrine.

Impact

The bill's enactment is expected to significantly tighten regulations governing how pharmaceutical products containing pseudoephedrine are dispensed and used. By requiring electronic logs of sales, the legislation aims to create a stricter accountability system for pharmacies. Additionally, the law will supersede any local regulations on the sale of these compounds, centralizing authority under state control. This shift may streamline enforcement and provide the Office of Drug Control Policy with enhanced oversight capabilities regarding the sale of potentially harmful substances.

Summary

House Bill 386 relates to the regulation of purchasing limits for pseudoephedrine, a precursor in the illicit production of methamphetamine. This bill amends existing regulations to enhance control over the sale of products containing ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine. Among the notable provisions, the bill mandates that these products can only be sold by licensed pharmacists or pharmacy technicians and requires customers to present photo identification and sign a usage log when making purchases. This approach aims to ensure better tracking of the distribution of these substances to curb misuse effectively.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 386 appears to be supportive among legislative members focused on drug control and public safety. Advocates argue that these measures will significantly reduce the likelihood of misuse and contribute to a larger public health objective of preventing substance abuse. However, there might be concerns from pharmacy practitioners regarding the additional administrative burdens imposed by the logging requirements and potential fines for non-compliance, suggesting a level of apprehension regarding the operational impacts of the new law.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding HB 386 includes the balance between the need for effective drug control and the operational freedom of pharmacies. While supporters laud the intention to prevent illegal drug manufacturing, critics may argue that the stringent logging requirements could impose undue burdens on small pharmacies. Additionally, restrictions on purchases by minors are emphasized, reflecting a public health approach but raising questions about the enforcement and implications for responsible access to necessary medications.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

LA HB688

Provides relative to products containing pseudoephedrine, ephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine

MO SB1485

Modifies the amount of certain drugs that may be sold or dispensed to an individual in a 12-month period

MO SB726

Limits the sale or purchase of certain drugs

WV SB668

Increasing amount of certain controlled substances persons may purchase annually

WV HB5022

Relating to increasing the amount of ephedrine, pseudoephedrine or phenylpropanolamine a person may purchase annually.

CA AB1218

Controlled substances.

AZ SB1450

Drug possession; classification

AZ HB2045

Dangerous drugs; definition; xylazine