A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION urging the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet to petition the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials to designate certain highways as United States Highway 111.
The bill aims to enhance tourism in Southern Kentucky and nearby regions by establishing a recognizable highway number that can attract more travelers. By designating these highways as U.S. Highway 111, the proposal intends to streamline travel along a scenic route linking Kentucky and Tennessee, which supports local economic activity by encouraging tourism and facilitating access to natural attractions and commercial areas. This strategic highway designation is expected to align with current traffic patterns and possibly lead to increased visitors and economic uplift without the need for additional road construction costs.
House Concurrent Resolution 61 (HCR61) urges the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet to petition the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) to designate certain highways in Kentucky as United States Highway 111. The bill cites the significant contribution of tourism to Kentucky's economy, generating approximately $13 billion annually, and emphasizes the potential benefits of having recognizable highway designations to promote tourism in areas that may be underappreciated due to their lower than average income levels.
Overall, the sentiment surrounding HCR61 appears positive, with advocates highlighting the potential economic revitalization and enhanced tourism opportunities as compelling reasons for the highway designation. Supporters believe that creating a unified highway number will improve travel efficiency and promote regional attractions, which can significantly benefit local communities economically. However, there may be underlying concerns regarding the operational implications of such a designation and a need for effective coordination among state agencies and local authorities to ensure seamless implementation.
While the resolution does not seem to face significant opposition in its framework, there may be logistical considerations, such as how this designation will coincide with existing route numbers and the responsibilities of local officials in the co-signing process. It is essential to ensure that the established routes are not eliminated but rather complement the existing system, as indicated in the bill’s details where certain segments are optional based on AASHTO's feedback. The collaborative efforts required emphasize the need to address any potential discrepancies or misunderstandings among stakeholders in managing the highway's designation effectively.