Louisiana House Bill HB1333

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/19/10
• Refer: 4/20/10

Caption

Authorizes the LSU Board of Supervisors to adjust tuition and mandatory fee amounts and to assess an operational fee for students at LSU/Baton Rouge

Impact

The bill has implications for funding and financial management within Louisiana's public higher education system, particularly focusing on LSU as the state's flagship university. By granting this authority to the LSU Board of Supervisors, the legislation seeks to ensure that the university can respond effectively to financial realities and maintain competitive tuition levels in relation to peer institutions. Additionally, provisions within the bill require the board to establish criteria for waivers for students facing financial hardship, which is crucial for ensuring access to education for economically disadvantaged students.

Summary

House Bill 1333 authorizes the Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University (LSU) to adjust tuition and mandatory fee amounts, as well as to assess an operational fee for students attending LSU/Baton Rouge. This bill aims to provide the LSU Board with greater flexibility to modify the costs associated with higher education during the 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 academic years. Specifically, it allows for annual tuition increases of up to 5% and an additional operational fee of $100 per semester for full-time students, with prorated fees for part-time students. The aim is to provide a means for LSU to address budgetary constraints while continuing to offer essential services and programs to its students.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around HB 1333 appears to reflect a supportive stance from those who recognize the need for higher education institutions to adapt quickly to economic demands. Supporters argue that the bill is a necessary step in balancing the university's financial needs while maintaining educational quality. However, there are concerns raised by opponents regarding the potential increase in financial burden on students, especially during times of economic uncertainty. The emphasis on financial hardship waivers highlights an understanding of the challenges faced by students.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential for increased tuition costs impacting student accessibility to higher education, which has been a concern among advocates for affordable education. While supporters of the bill view the adjustments as necessary for the sustainability of programs and services, critics argue that increased tuition can deter lower-income students from pursuing their studies at LSU. The debate continues to reflect broader discussions on education funding, tuition equity, and the role of state funding in public higher education.