Louisiana House Bill HB344

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

Caption

Authorizes the LSU Board of Supervisors to impose certain tuition and fee amounts at certain institutions

Impact

The legislation is intended to provide LSU with additional revenue options to enhance educational offerings and infrastructure. By granting the authority to charge prospective students for new fees, particularly for distance education programs, this bill aims to align tuition structures with those of traditional in-person programs. Furthermore, the proposed fees for students in dental programs are designed to cover the increased costs of specialized supplies and equipment necessary for their education.

Summary

House Bill 344, introduced by Representative Foil, authorizes the Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University (LSU) to impose specific tuition and fee amounts at LSU-Baton Rouge and the LSU School of Dentistry. The bill allows for the imposition of tuition and attendance fees for students enrolled in academic degree programs offered entirely through distance education, as well as various additional fees including a digital media program fee for graduate and professional degree students, and a technology and infrastructure enhancement fee that increases incrementally over several academic years.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment around HB 344 appears to be supportive from the administration and board members, who view it as a necessary step to modernize tuition structures and better fund educational programs. However, concerns may be raised among students and advocacy groups regarding the increasing cost of education and the potential burden of additional fees on students, particularly those facing financial hardships.

Contention

The key points of contention surrounding the bill center on the balance between necessary funding for educational programs and the financial implications for students. While proponents argue that the new fees will lead to improved resources and educational quality, opponents may criticize the bill for potentially exacerbating the rising costs of higher education and making it less accessible to students from lower-income backgrounds.