Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB270

Introduced
3/29/10  

Caption

Provides for additional tuition charges on a per-hour basis

Impact

The enactment of HB 270 has the potential to reshape financial obligations for students pursuing higher education in Louisiana. While proponents may argue that additional funding derived from these charges could enhance educational resources, it raises concerns regarding accessibility and affordability. In particular, the bill mandates that universities establish criteria for tuition waivers based on financial hardship, which could mitigate some negative implications for economically disadvantaged students. Nonetheless, the overall increase in tuition costs could pose challenges for many students with limited financial means.

Summary

House Bill 270 authorizes specific university governance boards in Louisiana—namely, the Louisiana State University System, Southern University System, and University of Louisiana System—to impose additional tuition charges per credit hour for students who enroll in excess of 12 credit hours per semester or 8 credit hours per quarter. The maximum additional charge is limited to one-twelfth of the tuition for 12 credit hours or one-eighth for 8 credit hours, and such an increase can only apply to a maximum of three additional credit hours. This bill reflects an attempt to better manage tuition revenue in the context of high enrollment demands.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 270 appears mixed among stakeholders. Supporters, including certain lawmakers and educational administrators, endorse the bill as necessary for sustaining institutional funding amid budget constraints. In contrast, critics—including student advocacy groups—express apprehension about the increased financial burden this legislation places on students. Such concerns particularly resonate among those advocating for affordable higher education, fearing this could further alienate low-income students from pursuing degrees.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between the funding needs of higher education institutions and the financial realities facing students. While institutions argue for the necessity of these tuition increases to maintain educational standards, opponents warn that such policies may disproportionately impact low-income and working-class students who may struggle with the unexpected rise in educational costs. This tension highlights a significant debate in educational policy concerning funding solutions and equitable access to higher education in Louisiana.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.