Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB472

Introduced
3/29/10  
Refer
3/29/10  
Report Pass
5/3/10  
Engrossed
5/12/10  
Refer
5/13/10  
Report Pass
6/3/10  
Enrolled
6/11/10  
Chaptered
6/21/10  

Caption

Prohibits public entities from contracting with unlicensed motor vehicle dealers (OR SEE FISC NOTE)

Impact

The enactment of HB 472 represents a significant modification to the state's procurement laws, particularly concerning vehicle acquisitions. By clarifying the requirements for contracting with dealers, the bill aims to safeguard public funds by ensuring that only legitimate businesses with proper licensure can participate in government contracts. This measure is expected to positively impact state laws by bolstering regulatory compliance and enhancing the effectiveness of procurement practices related to motor vehicles.

Summary

House Bill 472 aims to enhance the integrity of public procurement processes in Louisiana by prohibiting public entities from contracting with motor vehicle dealers who lack a valid dealer's license issued by the Louisiana Motor Vehicle Commission. The bill seeks to ensure that all dealers engaged in contracts for vehicle procurement are duly licensed, thereby promoting accountability and reducing the risk of fraud or misconduct in public transactions. By mandating that bids and contracts include proof of a valid dealer’s license, the law reinforces the standards required for entities that engage with government agencies.

Sentiment

Discussions around HB 472 have generally leaned towards support for increased regulatory measures. Advocates of the bill, which include members of the legislature who prioritize responsible governance, argue that it represents a necessary step towards curbing fraudulent practices and ensuring that public contracts are awarded transparently and legitimately. Conversely, while there may be concerns regarding the impact on dealers who may struggle to meet licensure requirements, the prevailing sentiment appears to favor stricter oversight.

Contention

Despite the supportive comments, some potential points of contention could arise among dealers who may find the requirements onerous or believe they may disadvantage smaller or new business entities. Further discussions in the legislative context might center around the balance of ensuring high standards in public procurement while also fostering a competitive environment for motor vehicle sales. The enforcement mechanisms and how public entities will implement these new requirements, particularly during audits, could also become areas of concern as the bill progresses.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB954

Dental services: third-party network access.

DC B25-0265

Contract No. GAGA-2022-C-0259 with SodexoMagic, LLC Approval and Payment Authorization Emergency Act of 2023

TX SB543

Relating to oversight of and requirements applicable to state contracts and other state financial and accounting issues; authorizing fees.

TX HB1426

Relating to certain requirements applicable to contracts entered into by, and the contract management process of, state agencies.

MS HB934

Healthcare Contracting Simplification Act; create.

NJ S3443

Requires State Contract Managers to monitor work conducted by subcontractors on State contracts.

NJ A4487

Requires State Contract Managers to monitor work conducted by subcontractors on State contracts.

CA SB681

Public employees’ retirement: contracting agencies: termination.