Louisiana House Bill HB578

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against DOTD in the suit entitled "Thad Badeaux v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government"

Impact

The passing of HB 578 will directly impact state financial management as it acknowledges and addresses the state's liability in a legal case. By appropriating funds for the payment of this judgment, the bill ensures that the state acts in compliance with the court's mandate, thereby preventing potential penalties or further legal complications. It reinforces the state's accountability in legal matters involving its departments and provides a clear process for handling judgments against governmental bodies.

Summary

House Bill 578 is an appropriation measure that aims to allocate funds from the General Fund of the state of Louisiana for the fiscal year 2010-2011. This bill specifically appropriates the sum of $13,370.47 to pay a consent judgment stemming from the lawsuit titled 'Thad Badeaux v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government.' The judgment involves the Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) and a private entity, Four A Investment Corporation. The intent here is to fulfill the financial obligations arising from the court's decision in this matter.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 578 appears to be largely procedural and neutral. Given that the bill is focused on settling a legal judgment, it is unlikely to be contentious in terms of public debate or legislative conflict. Most discussions surrounding such appropriation bills generally emphasize the necessity of fulfilling legal obligations and ensure that the state maintains its financial and legal credibility.

Contention

There may be minimal contention surrounding HB 578, primarily because it concerns a specific legal obligation rather than a broader policy issue. However, the underpinning implications of the judgment may evoke discussions about the efficiency and accountability of the DOTD and local government operations. As with any appropriation bill, there could be debates about the prioritization of spending state funds, particularly during budget discussions, but this bill's specific legal nature likely minimizes significant opposition.