Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB176

Introduced
3/29/10  

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against DOTD in the suit entitled "Fayer J. Norman v. Roberto Cruz, et al" consolidated with "Harding Tatum and Pennie Tatum v. Fayer J. Norman, et al"

Impact

The appropriation outlined in this bill will impact state finances, as it redirects funds that could have been allocated to other areas within the state's budget. It provides a mechanism for the state to address outstanding legal judgments and maintain compliance with court rulings, thereby minimizing potential legal liabilities or further financial repercussions stemming from litigation against the state.

Summary

House Bill 176 aims to appropriate $25,000 from the state general fund for the fiscal year 2010-2011 to pay a consent judgment stemming from the case of 'Fayer J. Norman v. Roberto Cruz, et al', which is consolidated with 'Harding Tatum and Pennie Tatum v. Fayer J. Norman, et al'. This bill is primarily concerned with ensuring that financial obligations from legal judgments against the Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) are fulfilled.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 176 appears to be largely procedural since it constitutes a routine measure to resolve a specific financial obligation. There might not be significant controversy associated with the bill itself, as it deals with the execution of a court order rather than introducing new policies or regulations. Legislative discourse likely centered on the importance of fulfilling legal commitments, reflecting a consensus on accountability in government operations.

Contention

While there do not appear to be significant points of contention explicitly noted in relation to HB 176, bills that involve appropriations for legal judgments may still generate debate, particularly regarding the adequacy of funding in other areas or the implications of the lawsuit itself. The underlying case represents legal matters involving the DOTD, which could be a focal point for discussions about the department's management and policies.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

LA HB321

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against DOTD in the suit entitled "Pamela Noel Godfrey Cali, et al. v. Denacua Cory, et al."

LA HB674

Appropriates funds for the payment of judgment against DOTD in the suit entitled "Olivia M. Krause, et al. v. Russell G. Hebert, Jr., et al."

LA HB218

Appropriates funds for payment of a judgment against the state in the suit entitled Victoria Roach v. State of La. et al. consolidated with Michael Lee McVey and Norma Cheryl McVey v. State of La. et al.

LA HB126

Appropriates funds for payment judgment against DOTD in the suit entitled "Robert Lee Archer, et al v. Steven P. Aldridge, et al"

LA HB82

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against the state of Louisiana in the suit entitled "Janelle Ford v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, et al"

LA HB395

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against DOTD in the suit entitled "Jeremy Waltrip, et al v. State of Louisiana, et al."

LA HB83

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against DOTD in the suit entitled "Sarah Harris, et al v. Brandy Jarrells, et al"

LA HB1345

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against DOTD in the suit entitled "Jason Sampson v. William S. Jonson, et al." consolidated with "Latharie Sylvain v. Allstate Insurance Company, et al."

LA HB1298

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the suit against the DOTD entitled "Jessie Bell Jones, et al. v. Christopher Ordoyne, et al."

LA HB86

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against DOTD in the suit entitled "Tiffany Mayo, et al v. Ford Motor Company, et al"

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.