Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB699

Introduced
3/29/10  
Refer
3/29/10  
Report Pass
4/26/10  
Engrossed
5/4/10  
Refer
5/5/10  
Report Pass
6/9/10  
Refer
6/10/10  
Enrolled
6/21/10  
Chaptered
7/8/10  

Caption

Provides for the review and audit process for performance-based energy efficiency contracts (EN NO IMPACT See Note)

Impact

The implications of HB 699 are significant as it alters how state agencies approach energy efficiency initiatives. By mandating a structured approval and evaluation process, the bill seeks to ensure that energy efficiency contracts are not only cost-effective but also enforceable and aligned with the state's legislative standards. The establishment of periodic performance audits further underscores a commitment to accountability, intending to maintain transparency and rigor in the expenditure of state funds related to energy efficiency procurement.

Summary

House Bill 699 focuses on the amendment and reenactment of provisions related to performance-based energy efficiency contracts. The bill lays out a detailed process for the evaluation, approval, and audit of such contracts, necessitating the involvement of the commissioner of administration and the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget. It establishes the Energy Efficiency Procurement Support Team to oversee the review process, ensuring that all contracts undergo thorough evaluation prior to approval. This oversight aims to enhance the effectiveness and accountability of energy efficiency measures taken by state agencies.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be supportive, especially among lawmakers and stakeholders focused on promoting energy efficiency within state operations. Advocates argue that adopting a formalized review process will lead to more effective resource management and improved public interest. There are, however, concerns raised by some about the potential bureaucratic delays that could arise from requiring extensive reviews and approvals, which may slow down the implementation of much-needed energy efficiency projects.

Contention

Key points of contention in discussions around HB 699 center on the balance between oversight and efficiency. Opponents worry that the additional layers of approval may hinder timely action on energy initiatives, particularly in cases where rapid response is necessary. Proponents assert that the bill will prevent misuse of funds and ensure that all energy projects are thoroughly vetted and beneficial in the long run. The bill encapsulates a larger discussion about how best to manage state resources while promoting environmental sustainability through energy efficiency.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

LA HB1062

Requires certain contracting entities to submit information to the commissioner of administration prior to contracting with a state agency or receiving monies (OR +$60,000 GF EX See Note)

LA HB626

Requires certain quasi public and nongovernmental entities to submit information to the legislative auditor and be approved by the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget prior to receiving state monies or assistance

LA HB1261

Requires certain quasi public and nongovernmental entities to submit information to the legislative auditor and be approved by the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget prior to receiving state monies or assistance (RE +$135,000 GF EX See Note)

LA HCR2

Directs the commissioner of administration, the commissioner of higher education, and statewide elected officials to review certain state contracts to identify any that can be terminated and report to the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget by March 1, 2016 (EN NO IMPACT See Note)

CA SB1087

PACE program: program administrators.

MD SB823

Pharmacy Services Administrative Organizations and Pharmacy Benefits Managers – Contracts

MD HB973

Pharmacy Services Administrative Organizations and Pharmacy Benefits Managers - Contracts

CA AB2063

California Financing Law: PACE program administrators.