Louisiana House Bill HCR65

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/30/10
• Refer: 3/31/10
• Report Pass: 6/3/10
• Engrossed: 6/9/10
• Refer: 6/10/10

Caption

Applies to congress to call a convention pursuant to Article V of the U.S. Constitution to propose an amendment regarding a requirement to reduce the federal debt through annual appropriations

Impact

If passed, HCR65 would allow delegates from each state to attend a convention that can propose amendments specifically focused on limiting federal spending and debt accumulation. The resolution carefully delineates that delegates can only address issues that are explicitly defined in the applications from the states, which provides a certain level of assurance against the risk of unintended consequences or unintended constitutional changes. This bill aims to enhance accountability regarding fiscal operations at the federal level, aligning with similar movements in other states.

Summary

HCR65 is a concurrent resolution from the Louisiana Legislature applying to Congress for the calling of a convention under Article V of the U.S. Constitution. The purpose of this proposed convention would be to draft an amendment requiring the federal government to reduce the national debt through annual appropriations. This legislative move underscores a growing concern among many states about the increasing federal debt and the necessity for established fiscal responsibility at a national level.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR65 appears to be mixed, reflecting both support and resistance to a constitutional convention. Proponents argue that tightening federal spending is necessary to ensure economic stability and responsible governance. However, there are concerns from critics who fear that such a convention could lead to unforeseen amendments that might undermine individual rights or alter the federal-state balance of power.

Contention

Opposition to HCR65 comes primarily from fears around the uncertainties of a constitutional convention. Critics worry about the potential for a 'runaway convention' that might address issues beyond the intended scope of reducing federal debt, thus potentially threatening civil liberties or changing the fabric of the Constitution without widespread consensus. This reflects a historical concern regarding the use of Article V for constitutional amendments and the implications it could hold for future governance.