Louisiana House Bill HCR66

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/30/10
• Refer: 3/31/10
• Report Pass: 6/3/10
• Engrossed: 6/9/10
• Refer: 6/10/10

Caption

Applies to congress to call a convention pursuant to Article V of the U.S. Constitution to propose an amendment regarding an overall spending limitation on the federal budget (EG SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)

Impact

If passed, HCR66 would initiate a process that allows states to call for a convention where amendments to the Constitution can be proposed. This resolution sets forth specific guidelines concerning the selection and authority of delegates, limiting their ability to propose amendments only to the subject enumerated in the applications from the states. The implications of this resolution could significantly affect federal budget management and reshape the dynamics of federal-state financial relationships.

Summary

HCR66 is a resolution from the Louisiana Legislature applying to the United States Congress for a convention under Article V of the Constitution. The purpose of this convention is to propose an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would impose an overall spending limitation on the federal budget. This regulation is aimed at addressing concerns around federal fiscal responsibility and the long-term implications of national debt on both state and public finances. Supporters of the resolution believe that such an amendment would provide necessary checks on government spending and prevent fiscal irresponsibility at the federal level.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR66 appears to be divided among state lawmakers and constituents. Proponents argue that imposing fiscal discipline at the federal level is essential for economic stability. They believe that this measure could lead to a more responsible governance framework. Conversely, opponents express concerns that amending the Constitution could lead to unintended consequences, urging that existing mechanisms for budgetary controls should be strengthened rather than initiating a convention that could open broader, potentially more harmful discussions about constitutional amendments.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the fear among critics that a convention could evolve beyond budgetary constraints, thereby risking significant alterations to the Constitution. The parameters set by HCR66 strive to limit the scope of proposed amendments, but skeptics worry that once the convention convenes, delegates may attempt to address broader issues than initially intended. This raises important questions around the delegation of authority and the potential risks of unanticipated constitutional changes.