Louisiana House Bill HSR12

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

Caption

Requests the House Committee on House and Governmental Affairs to study access and decorum in areas of the State Capitol controlled by the House of Representatives

Impact

The implications of HSR12, if acted upon, could lead to significant changes in how legislative bodies manage access to their facilities and maintain decorum. The findings and recommendations from the study could help establish clearer guidelines that would enhance the organization of legislative sessions. This might result in improved public access during discussions and presentations, as well as a more respectful atmosphere in committee debates and interactions among members.

Summary

House Study Request No. 12 (HSR12) proposes a study focused on access and decorum within areas of the State Capitol that are controlled by the House of Representatives. This initiative stems from ongoing observations regarding the sometimes chaotic atmosphere that can occur during legislative sessions. The bill highlights the need for a balance between the open discussion of issues and the orderly conduct of proceedings within the legislative framework. It calls upon the House Committee on House and Governmental Affairs to examine this matter thoroughly.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HSR12 appears to be pragmatic, recognizing the necessity for improved organization within the State Capitol. While there may not be pronounced opposition or support specifically noted in the discussions, the bill addresses a common challenge within legislative bodies regarding the need for structure amidst the inherent chaos of political discourse. Lawmakers are seemingly aligned on the need to uphold decorum while allowing for robust debate.

Contention

Despite the constructive intent of HSR12, some concerns may emerge regarding the definitions of 'decorum' and 'access.' Lawmakers may debate how to balance structured proceedings with the democratic principle of open dialogue. Additionally, the issues surrounding who controls access to certain areas and how decorum is enforced could lead to disagreements on implementation. Establishing these parameters may be contentious as the committee prepares to report back its findings.