Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB14

Introduced
3/29/10  
Refer
3/29/10  
Report Pass
4/20/10  
Engrossed
4/26/10  

Caption

Provides relative to the Louisiana State Employees' Retirement System (LASERS) and allows for a change in beneficiary for purposes of joint and survivor annuities.(7/1/10) (EG NO IMPACT APV)

Impact

The implementation of SB14 modifies existing statutes concerning retiree benefits. As a result, it provides new rights to reemployed LASERS retirees regarding the naming of beneficiaries for supplemental benefits. This change in the law could affect how benefits are distributed in case of the retiree’s death, ensuring that beneficiaries align with their current family circumstances without jeopardizing existing commitments to former spouses.

Summary

Senate Bill 14, also known as SB14, concerns the Louisiana State Employees' Retirement System (LASERS) and proposes significant changes regarding the designation of beneficiaries for retirees who return to work in LASERS-covered positions. The bill aims to allow retirees who had previously named a former spouse as their beneficiary to designate a current spouse when reemployed, but strictly for supplemental benefits accrued after their return. This designates a clear priority for current marriages over previous arrangements while ensuring that prior beneficiaries maintain their rights to benefits accrued prior to any changes.

Sentiment

Overall, discussions around SB14 reflect a supportive sentiment towards balancing the rights of reemployed retirees with their previous commitments. Advocates highlight the importance of ensuring that retirees can designate their current spouses in light of new income streams from reemployment, while opponents may voice concerns about the implications of such changes on the financial integrity of the retirement system and potential liabilities arising from adjustments in beneficiary designations.

Contention

A noteworthy point of contention arises concerning the fiscal implications of allowing such changes in beneficiary designations. Proponents argue that such changes will align benefits with current familial obligations, whereas critics caution against potential strains on the retirement system's resources. Furthermore, the aspect of liability contained within the bill mandates that a retiree must hold the system harmless for changes, adding an additional layer of legal consideration that stakeholders must navigate.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB868

State teachers’ retirement: supplemental benefits.

CA SB1165

State teachers’ retirement.

NM HB304

Public Employee Retirement Needs Trusts

CA AB1325

State teachers’ retirement.

MI HB6089

Retirement: state employees; annual retirement allowance increase; eliminate cap. Amends sec. 20g of 1943 PA 240 (MCL 38.20g).

MI SB1144

Retirement: state employees; annual retirement allowance increase; eliminate cap. Amends sec. 20g of 1943 PA 240 (MCL 38.20g).

CA SB1322

Medi-Cal: comprehensive medication management.

LA SB5

Relative to the Louisiana State Employees' Retirement System (LASERS), allows for a change in beneficiary for purposes of joint and survivor annuities. (2/3 - CA10s29(F)) (7/1/11) (RE NO IMPACT APV)