Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB151

Introduced
3/29/10  
Refer
3/29/10  
Report Pass
4/14/10  
Engrossed
4/20/10  
Refer
4/21/10  
Report Pass
5/12/10  
Enrolled
5/26/10  
Chaptered
6/1/10  

Caption

Enhances the penalties for criminal and terrorists acts where the use of an Internet, virtual, street-level map is used in the commission of the crime or terrorist act. (8/15/10)

Impact

If enacted, SB151 will amend existing statutes under the Louisiana Revised Statutes to include defined penalties for crimes committed with the assistance of mapping technologies. Specifically, if an Internet, virtual, street-level map is used in a criminal act, offenders face an additional sentence of at least one year. For acts of terrorism involving these mapping tools, the sentence would rise to a minimum of ten years without the possibility of parole, probation, or suspension, emphasizing the state's serious stance against terrorism and the use of modern technology in facilitating crimes.

Summary

Senate Bill 151 introduces significant amendments to Louisiana state law regarding the use of Internet, virtual, street-level maps in the commission of criminal offences. The bill defines and prohibits the use of these mapping technologies when committing or attempting acts of terrorism or crimes against individuals or property. Under this bill, there would be enhanced penalties for offenders who utilize such technologies in the commission of a crime, aimed at deterring misuse of publicly available geographic information.

Sentiment

The sentiments expressed during discussions around SB151 are notably focused on public safety and the implications of technology in criminal activities. Proponents argue that the legislation is a necessary step in adapting to evolving crime methods that leverage digital technologies. However, concerns have been raised regarding the overreach of the law and potential misuse of the legislative power to regulate the use of commonplace resources, such as mapping applications, which could impact innocent users.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the broad definition of what constitutes an 'Internet, virtual, street-level map,' which may encompass various platforms and applications. Critics argue that this vagueness could lead to unfair convictions and challenges for users who engage in legitimate activities using mapping technology. Additionally, some fear that the bill places undue penalties on individuals without sufficient evidence linking their actions to criminal intent, raising questions about due process and civil liberties.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.