Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB248

Introduced
3/29/10  
Refer
3/29/10  
Report Pass
4/7/10  
Engrossed
4/14/10  
Refer
4/15/10  
Report Pass
5/12/10  
Enrolled
6/18/10  
Chaptered
6/30/10  

Caption

Provides for the applicability of, and exemptions from, the Administrative Procedure Act. (gov sig)

Impact

The provisions outlined in SB248 are significant as they redefine how state agencies can implement fees, requiring adherence to prescribed procedures unless specifically exempted. The bill seeks to eliminate ambiguities surrounding fee adjustments, making it clearer for both the governing bodies and the citizens impacted by these fees. By incorporating various existing exemptions into the chapter, it aims to balance the necessity for regulatory compliance with the operational needs of state agencies.

Summary

Senate Bill 248 aims to amend Louisiana's Administrative Procedure Act by clarifying the applicability and exemptions related to rulemaking and fee adjustments by governmental agencies. The bill introduces a definition of 'adopt' in relation to fees, indicating procedures that need to be followed for the implementation or modification of fees by agencies. By establishing concrete guidelines, SB248 seeks to enforce consistency and transparency in the adoption of rules and associated fees across various agencies within the state.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB248 appears to be supportive, with many stakeholders recognizing the need for clearer guidelines in administrative procedures. Advocates argue that clarity leads to better governance and accountability, ultimately benefiting the public. However, some concerns were raised about potential overreach in regulations and how exemptions may allow for circumvention of due process in rulemaking, pointing to a need for ongoing discussions about the implications of these changes.

Contention

One of the main points of contention is the aspect of exemptions included in the bill. While proponents argue that these exemptions are necessary for efficient governance, critics express the fear that they could undermine the intended transparency and accountability of the rulemaking process. The debate reflects a broader discussion on the balance between effective governance and the rights of citizens to have a say in the regulatory processes that affect them.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.