Louisiana Senate Bill SB260

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 3/30/10
• Engrossed: 4/8/10
• Refer: 4/12/10
• Report Pass: 5/13/10
• Enrolled: 6/1/10
• Chaptered: 6/9/10
• Passed: 6/9/10

Caption

Provides for an automobile allowance for the clerk of the district court in St. Tammany Parish, Tangipahoa Parish, and Washington Parish. (8/15/10)

Impact

The passage of SB260 would have a moderately positive impact on the financial support of court clerks in the specified parishes. By providing an automobile allowance, the bill acknowledges the importance of access to transportation for officials whose responsibilities may require travel across their jurisdictions. Importantly, the funding for this allowance is to come from surplus funds within the clerks' offices, meaning there will not be an additional financial burden placed on the state or local governing authorities.

Summary

Senate Bill 260 aims to provide an automobile expense allowance for the clerks of the district courts in St. Tammany Parish, Tangipahoa Parish, and Washington Parish. This bill specifically allows these clerks to receive an allowance equal to fifteen percent of their annual salary, contingent on the requirement that they maintain a specified amount of automobile insurance. The intention behind this legislation is to support clerical officers in fulfilling their duties more effectively, recognizing the need for transportation in carrying out court-related functions.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB260 appears to be supportive among those who recognize the logistical challenges faced by court clerks. There may be a sense of fairness in providing such allowances, as other public officials may have similar support. However, some critics could be concerned about any potential precedents this could set for additional allowances or expenses arising from public funds, although this bill's specified funding mechanism aims to alleviate such concerns.

Contention

Although the bill seems to garner support, there are broader implications to consider regarding public funding and allowances for officials. Discussions may arise about the appropriateness of using surplus funds in clerk offices for automobile expenses, leading to debates about transparency and accountability. Should this bill pave the way for similar measures across other jurisdictions or sectors, the conversation may evolve to scrutinize the criteria and justification for such allowances in relation to state financial management.