Louisiana Senate Bill SB448

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 4/12/10
• Engrossed: 5/4/10
• Refer: 5/5/10
• Report Pass: 6/3/10
• Enrolled: 6/16/10
• Chaptered: 6/29/10
• Passed: 6/29/10

Caption

Repeals requirement that BESE, the Board of Regents, and the postsecondary education management boards develop an academic assistance program in public high schools for college bound students unprepared for college work. (8/15/10)

Impact

The repeal of R.S. 17:401 will significantly impact state laws governing public education and the support provided to high school students moving into college. The removal of this requirement means that schools may no longer have a structured way to identify and assist students who need academic support for successful transition to college. This could potentially lead to an increase in students struggling with college coursework, particularly those who may benefit from additional preparation.

Summary

Senate Bill 448 aims to repeal the requirement for the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE), the Board of Regents, and the postsecondary education management boards to develop an academic assistance program for public high school students who are unprepared for college coursework. This bill targets the academic support systems for students who are planning to attend college but lack the necessary preparation to succeed in higher education. By removing this mandate, the bill seeks to eliminate what some see as an unnecessary state obligation.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 448 appears to be mixed. Supporters argue that the bill alleviates schools from the burden of adhering to mandates that may not reflect the needs of their specific student populations. They believe that local educational agencies should have the flexibility to decide how best to support their students. However, opponents express concerns that the repeal may disregard the importance of preparation programs, which are essential for equipping students with the skills necessary for success in college-level courses.

Contention

Notable points of contention focus on the necessity and effectiveness of academic assistance programs. Critics of the repeal argue that such programs are crucial in addressing gaps in student preparedness for college challenges. They worry that without a mandated assistance program, vulnerable student populations may face greater barriers in accessing higher education. Proponents, conversely, argue for more localized control and flexibility in addressing academic needs, suggesting that existing resources and initiatives can better serve students without the state's interference.