Louisiana Senate Bill SB476

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 4/14/10
• Engrossed: 4/19/10
• Refer: 4/20/10
• Report Pass: 5/25/10
• Enrolled: 6/14/10
• Chaptered: 6/30/10
• Passed: 6/30/10

Caption

Reduces the length of time the Department of Public Safety and Corrections is required to retain certain records. (8/15/10)

Impact

The proposed bill could significantly impact how the Department of Public Safety and Corrections manages its records, especially concerning adult offenders. By shortening the retention timeline, the department may alleviate some challenges associated with data management and storage. Proponents argue that this will make the processes more efficient and adapt to modern practices, while still maintaining a necessary archive of records for a reasonable duration. However, the bill could also raise concerns about access to historical data for legal purposes, rehabilitation programs, or public safety assessments, which might rely on longer retention of these records.

Summary

Senate Bill 476 aims to amend Louisiana's public records retention laws specifically concerning the Department of Public Safety and Corrections. The primary focus of the bill is to reduce the length of time required for the department to retain records related to adult offenders. Previously, the law mandated that such records be kept for ten years following the completion of the offender's sentence or until six years after the offender's death, whichever comes first. The new proposal reduces this retention period to six years across the board. This change is intended to streamline record-keeping practices and reduce the administrative burden on the department.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 476 appears to be generally supportive from those who believe in modernizing the record-keeping processes of the state. Advocates suggest that the change is a step towards efficient management of public resources. On the other hand, there may be dissenting opinions regarding the reduction in retention time, with some stakeholders, particularly in the legal and correctional sectors, arguing that reducing the retention period could hinder the oversight of offenders or the continuity of certain rehabilitation programs based on historical data.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention with the passing of SB 476 relates to the potential impact on transparency and accountability within the corrections system. Critics might argue that reducing the timeline for record retention could impede future investigations or reviews into the actions of offenders. Furthermore, there could be discussions about whether six years is sufficiently long for tracking re-offensive behaviors or maintaining an accurate historical record that informs correctional practices and policies.