Louisiana Senate Bill SB528

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 4/28/10
• Engrossed: 5/19/10
• Refer: 5/20/10
• Report Pass: 6/3/10
• Enrolled: 6/17/10
• Chaptered: 7/2/10
• Passed: 7/2/10

Caption

Requires an obstetric ultrasound be performed prior to an abortion. (8/15/10) (EN GF EX See Note)

Impact

This legislation significantly impacts state laws concerning abortion by instituting a requirement for an ultrasound and assessing viability before proceeding with an abortion. This could lead to potential delays in the abortion process and creates legal obligations for medical providers to comply with the mandated ultrasound requirements. Furthermore, it formalizes the process through which women must be informed and consent to the procedure, thereby altering the regulatory landscape of abortion providers within Louisiana.

Summary

Senate Bill 528 aims to amend and reenact certain provisions related to abortion, specifically mandating that an obstetric ultrasound be performed prior to any abortion procedure. The bill outlines the requirements for obtaining informed consent from the woman considering an abortion, ensuring that specific steps are followed before the procedure can occur. Notably, it specifies that physicians must utilize their medical judgment to determine the viability of the unborn child if the gestational age is twenty weeks or more, and requires documentation for all procedures performed.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 528 is sharply divided. Supporters argue that requiring an ultrasound provides crucial information that allows women to make more informed decisions regarding their pregnancies. They view it as a protective measure for both women's health and the unborn. Conversely, opponents criticize the bill as an infringement on women's rights, suggesting it adds unnecessary hurdles that could impede access to safe abortion services. This highlights the ongoing societal and political divides concerning reproductive rights.

Contention

Key points of contention in the discussions around SB 528 involve the implications of mandated ultrasounds on the privacy and autonomy of women seeking abortions. Critics argue that the requirement may coerce women into emotional distress or guilt, particularly if they do not wish to view the ultrasound images. Additionally, there are concerns regarding the medical professionals' obligations to ensure compliance with a long list of new regulatory requirements that may interfere with timely care and treatment for women experiencing medical emergencies.