Provides for the discontinuance of electronic or video bingo machines. (8/15/10)
The proposed law carries significant implications for state gaming regulations. Should the bill pass, it would mandate local elections as a prerequisite for the continuation of electronic bingo machines, effectively placing the decision-making power in the hands of local voters. If voters in a parish reject the use of these machines, no licensing for their operation would be granted, aligning with the voters' will and potentially leading to a reduction in electronic gaming in areas concerned about its impacts.
Senate Bill 532, introduced by Senator Marionneaux, aims to regulate the operation of electronic or video bingo machines in the state of Louisiana. The bill proposes that all electronic bingo machines be discontinued unless local electors approve their operation through a majority vote in a designated local election. This move seeks to provide local communities with the authority to determine whether to allow or prohibit such gaming activities within their respective parishes. The statewide election is set for November 2, 2010, where a proposition to permit or discontinue these machines will appear on the ballot in each parish.
The sentiment around SB532 appears to reflect a mix of support and concern. Supporters argue that this bill empowers local communities by allowing them to make decisions that fit their social and economic contexts. However, there may also be opposition from entities invested in electronic bingo operations who fear the economic consequences of decreased gaming opportunities. Community discussions might also broach concerns surrounding the social implications of gambling and its regulation.
A notable point of contention surrounding SB532 could be the balance between local control and the state's role in regulating gaming. While proponents see this legislation as a way to enhance local governance, critics may argue that this could create inconsistencies in gaming laws across the state. Moreover, the timing of the election and the implications for existing operations could lead to differing opinions on whether the bill serves the public interest or presents an unnecessary barrier to gaming opportunities.