Louisiana Senate Bill SB611

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 4/19/10
• Refer: 4/27/10
• Report Pass: 5/10/10
• Engrossed: 5/13/10
• Refer: 5/17/10
• Report Pass: 5/27/10
• Enrolled: 6/18/10
• Chaptered: 6/30/10
• Passed: 6/30/10

Caption

Provides relative to the River Park Development District in East Baton Rouge Parish (gov sig) (EN DECREASE GF RV See Note)

Impact

The establishment of the River Park Development District will grant the governing board the authority to levy taxes and special assessments, create subdistricts, issue bonds, and engage in tax increment financing. These powers are intended to enhance economic growth by allowing the district to fund various projects aimed at the redevelopment and improvement of local property. Furthermore, the bill lays out the structure for the district’s governance, ensuring that local stakeholders have representation in crucial decisions regarding the district’s direction.

Summary

Senate Bill 611 creates the River Park Development District in East Baton Rouge Parish as a political subdivision of the state of Louisiana. The primary aim of this bill is to promote cooperative economic and community development within the district through the governance of a newly formed board of commissioners. The designated area for the district comprises approximately 59.666 acres along the Mississippi River, which is expected to facilitate targeted development projects and improvements in the area.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 611 appears to be positive, with supporters emphasizing the potential for economic revitalization in East Baton Rouge Parish. Proponents argue that such development districts can lead to improved infrastructure and increased property values within the community. However, there may be concerns regarding management and oversight, given the financial powers given to the board, which could lead to debates on fiscal responsibility and transparency in the handling of public funds.

Contention

Notable points of contention could arise regarding the levels of taxation and assessments the district is authorized to impose, which may impact local residents and businesses. Moreover, the authority to create subdistricts and levy taxes beyond standard constitutional limits has the potential to spark discussions about local governance and taxpayer rights. The provision for bond issuance also invites scrutiny, as stakeholders may question how effectively the district will manage its financial obligations in relation to public interests.