Provides for the management and control of non-flood assets of levee districts. (8/15/10)
The implementation of SB 754 would not only transform existing management structures but also centralize authority under the Non-flood Protection Asset Management Authority. This shift could lead to a more effective allocation of resources and improved maintenance of assets owned by levee districts. Furthermore, the bill delineates the establishment of governance for the new authority, which includes a board of commissioners with specific appointments from various stakeholders, ensuring representation across relevant entities. The bill is expected to influence existing state laws by modifying how non-flood-related property is operated and maintained, effective from January 1, 2011.
Senate Bill 754 aims to establish a framework for the management and control of non-flood assets of levee districts in Louisiana by creating the Non-flood Protection Asset Management Authority. This authority is designed to streamline the governance and oversight of such assets, which may include various facilities or improvements that do not directly relate to flood control or water management. By transferring management responsibilities from the existing levee district boards to the newly formed authority, the bill seeks to ensure a consistent and coordinated approach to the management of non-flood assets throughout the state, thus enhancing efficiency and operational management.
The sentiment surrounding SB 754 is largely supportive among those who advocate for streamlined governance and increased efficiency in asset management. Proponents argue that establishing the Non-flood Protection Asset Management Authority will standardize practices and improve the oversight of non-flood facilities. However, there are also concerns raised by opponents who fear that the centralization of authority may diminish local control and oversight over these assets, which some stakeholders believe is critical for responsive and tailored management to local needs.
Notable points of contention include the transition of asset management from levee district boards to a state-managed authority, which may face resistance from local entities concerned about losing control. Additionally, the bill's provision that board members will not receive compensation for their role, but will receive a nominal daily allowance for meeting attendance, has sparked debates about the adequacy of incentives for those overseeing critical assets. Critics also emphasize the importance of maintaining local practices and adaptability in managing non-flood-related facilities, voicing apprehensions about potential bureaucratic inefficiencies and lack of local input in decision-making processes.