Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB90

Introduced
3/29/10  
Refer
3/29/10  
Report Pass
4/26/10  
Engrossed
4/29/10  
Refer
5/3/10  
Report Pass
5/27/10  
Enrolled
6/16/10  
Chaptered
6/22/10  

Caption

Provides relative to the Lakeview Crime Prevention District. (7/1/10)

Impact

The impact of SB90 on state laws is significant as it modifies existing regulations and procedures governing local crime prevention districts. By adjusting the appointment process for board members, the bill allows for a more representative governance structure that reflects the interests of diverse stakeholders in the affected communities. The authorization to levy and renew parcel fees with fewer restrictions is expected to increase funding for safety and security measures, thereby potentially improving community policing and crime deterrent strategies in the Lakeview area.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 90, introduced by Senator Murray, aims to amend the provisions related to the governance and funding of the Lakeview Crime Prevention District in Orleans Parish, Louisiana. Notably, the bill grants additional authority concerning appointments to the board of commissioners overseeing the district and modifies the process concerning the levy and renewal of a parcel fee that supports crime prevention efforts in the area. By removing certain limitations on the renewal of this fee, the bill seeks to enhance the financial resources available for crime prevention initiatives.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB90 has been mixed. Supporters argue that the adjustments will empower the Lakeview community to better address its unique safety needs and ensure a more robust governance model for crime prevention. On the other hand, some critics may be concerned about the potential overreach of local government powers and the implications of increased fees on local residents. As a result, while many view the bill as a positive step towards enhancing community safety, there are apprehensions regarding its financial implications.

Contention

Key points of contention involve the balance between adequate funding for crime prevention and the tax burden on residents through increased parcel fees. Additionally, the modified appointment process could lead to debates about who gets selected for important roles in the governance of the district, as the composition of the board could shift political dynamics and influence local law enforcement priorities. Therefore, while the bill is positioned as a necessary modernization of local governance, it carries with it a need for careful deliberation on its broader effects within the community.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.