Louisiana Senate Bill SR10

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/30/10
• Refer: 3/30/10

Caption

Provides with respect to the election of the president and president pro tempore of the Senate.

Impact

The adoption of SR10 would have a direct impact on how the leadership roles within the Senate are elected, emphasizing confidentiality and potentially leading to a more democratic selection process. The proposed rule does not alter the requirement of an affirmative vote from at least twenty members but changes how that decision is made. By implementing a secret ballot, it may encourage senators to vote based solely on their convictions without external influences, which could result in more representative leadership.

Summary

Senate Resolution No. 10 seeks to amend the Rules of Order of the Senate pertaining to the election process of the president and president pro tempore of the Senate. Under the current procedural mechanism, the election of the Senate president is conducted through a public viva voce vote. SR10 proposes a shift to a confidential ballot system, allowing senators to vote without revealing their choice publicly. This change is intended to enhance the integrity and transparency of the election process by minimizing peer pressure during voting.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SR10 appears to be supportive among those who prioritize the principles of democratic election and confidentiality in governance. Advocates for the resolution argue that a confidential ballot system fosters fairness, while critics may raise concerns regarding transparency and accountability. Overall, there seems to be a favorable view towards reforming the election process to align more closely with democratic norms.

Contention

While SR10 primarily addresses procedural changes, it could spark debate regarding the balance of power and influence within the Senate. Some members may be concerned that a confidential voting system could lead to unintended consequences, such as weakened accountability among leaders. Additionally, the transition from a public vote to a confidential one might face resistance from those who value openness in the electoral process, highlighting the tension between transparency and confidentiality in governmental practices.