Louisiana Senate Bill SR117

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/7/10
• Refer: 6/7/10
• Passed: 6/7/10

Caption

Memorialize the president, congress, and the Federal Communications Commission to refrain from regulating Internet broadband services as common carrier services under Title II of the Communications Act of 1934.

Impact

The passage of SR117 would reinforce the current stance that minimizes federal regulation over broadband Internet services and encourages a continued free-market approach. By memorializing the need for less regulation, the resolution seeks to inhibit the FCC from implementing policies that could decelerate investments in broadband infrastructure, which are crucial for maintaining competitive and efficient Internet services. This could impact the future of local economies that rely on high-speed Internet connectivity.

Summary

Senate Resolution 117 aims to memorialize federal authorities, including the President of the United States, the United States Congress, and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), to avoid classifying Internet broadband services as common carrier services under Title II of the Communications Act of 1934. The resolution posits that the absence of stringent regulatory control has fostered significant advancements in Internet technology and infrastructure in Louisiana over the past twenty-five years. The authors of the resolution argue that the development of broadband networks has catalyzed job creation and enhanced economic conditions statewide.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SR117 appears to be primarily positive among its supporters, who view it as essential for fostering growth and innovation in the broadband sector. Advocates contend that existing non-regulation has positioned the U.S. at the forefront of Internet technology and that further regulation would impede progress. Nonetheless, while the resolution enjoys support, the potential for opposition regarding the necessity of consumer protections under common carrier status remains a critical point of debate.

Contention

One notable point of contention is the potential harm that could arise from not regulating broadband services under common carrier provisions. Critics might argue that without such regulation, broadband providers could engage in practices that disadvantage consumers, such as throttling service or prioritizing certain types of content. The resolution reflects a proactive stance against what its proponents perceive as outdated regulatory frameworks, but it remains to be seen how these positions will be reconciled with the need for consumer protections in a rapidly evolving digital landscape.