Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "Leroy M. Broussard, Jr., et al v. the State of Louisiana and DOTD"
Impact
The passage of HB 18 allows the state to fulfill its financial liability as established by the court's judgment, thereby ensuring compliance with judicial rulings. This action will have a localized impact, primarily affecting the parties involved in the case and potentially setting a precedent for how the state deals with similar legal obligations in the future. It emphasizes the necessity for state agencies, like the DOTD, to manage operational oversight and accountability concerning public funds.
Summary
House Bill 18 is an appropriations bill that authorizes the expenditure of $175,000 from the General Fund of the state of Louisiana for Fiscal Year 2011-2012. The funds are earmarked for the payment of a consent judgment in the case of 'Leroy M. Broussard, Jr. v. the State of Louisiana and the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD)'. This legislation is primarily concerned with addressing a legal obligation resulting from a court ruling in favor of Broussard against the state.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be straightforward as it addresses a legal requirement. There are no reported significant controversies or strong sentiments for or against this bill, given its nature as a means to settle a financial judgment. Lawmakers likely perceive it as a necessary step to uphold the rule of law and avoid further legal complications.
Contention
Given that HB 18 directly relates to the appropriation of funds for a specific legal case, the primary contention could arise from discussions on budget priorities or the implications of allocating such funds amid other state financial needs. However, specific points of contention or opposition were not documented within the available records, suggesting that the bill's purpose is perceived as non-controversial.