Louisiana Senate Bill SB39

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/25/11
• Refer: 4/25/11
• Report Pass: 5/10/11
• Engrossed: 5/17/11
• Refer: 5/18/11
• Report Pass: 6/8/11
• Enrolled: 6/16/11
• Chaptered: 6/24/11
• Passed: 6/24/11

Caption

Repeals provisions providing for the purchase of certain weapons or ammunition. (8/15/11)

Impact

The repeal of regulations concerning weapon and ammunition purchases may have significant implications for state laws regarding gun ownership and control. Supporters argue that removing these provisions will enhance personal freedom and affirm the rights of individuals to acquire firearms without additional restrictions. However, critics warn that such a move may lead to increased access to firearms and potentially exacerbate issues related to gun violence and public safety.

Summary

Senate Bill 39 aims to repeal specific provisions regarding the purchase of certain weapons or ammunition in Louisiana. This legislation eliminates Part III of Chapter 9 in Title 40 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes, which previously established rules governing the sale and distribution of these items. By removing these regulations, the bill seeks to simplify the legal landscape surrounding firearm purchases within the state and is seen as a move towards reducing governmental oversight in this area.

Sentiment

Discussion surrounding SB39 has exhibited a predominantly supportive sentiment from pro-gun advocates who perceive this bill as an important step towards deregulation. In contrast, those concerned about gun violence and safety issues have reacted negatively, fearing that the repeal could undermine efforts to maintain responsible gun ownership standards and prevent misuse. The divergence in opinions reflects a larger national debate on gun rights versus public safety measures.

Contention

Key points of contention regarding SB39 involve the balance of individual rights against community safety. Advocates for the repeal argue that it aligns with constitutional rights and personal freedoms, while opponents argue that it disregards necessary safety measures intended to protect the public. This bill raises critical questions about the role of state government in regulating firearms and the effectiveness of such regulations in preventing misuse and ensuring responsible ownership.