Provides relative to the Oil Spill Prevention and Response Act. (8/15/11)
The implementation of SB 97 is expected to enhance the safety of oil spill response actions within Louisiana by ensuring that dispersants meet stringent ecological standards. By mandating that only approved and non-toxic dispersants are utilized, the bill aims to minimize environmental harm while effectively cleaning up oil spills. This creates a crucial alignment with federal guidelines, thereby fortifying the state's legislative framework regarding oil spill management.
Senate Bill 97 aims to amend the Oil Spill Prevention and Response Act by establishing criteria for the use of dispersants in oil spill response and cleanup operations. The bill preserves existing law, which mandates the development of contingency plans for unauthorized oil discharges. However, it introduces specific requirements for dispersants used in mitigation efforts, including the necessity for those chemicals to be listed on the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) Subpart J Product Schedule and to be classified as 'Practically Non-Toxic' according to the EPA's ecotoxicity categories for aquatic organisms.
The sentiment surrounding SB 97 appears to be largely supportive, especially among environmental advocates and regulatory bodies concerned with aquatic health. Proponents of the bill argue that it reflects necessary precautions against potential detrimental impacts on marine ecosystems. However, there may also be contention among industries reliant on oil and gas, as they could perceive such regulations as additional burdens that complicate cleanup operations.
Despite the general support for SB 97, discussions may center around the economic implications for the oil industry. Businesses could express concerns regarding potential delays or increased costs associated with the new requirements for dispersants. Critics might argue that while protective measures are essential, they must also consider the economic realities and the need for efficient cleanup practices, prompting a debate on finding the right balance between environmental protection and operational feasibility.