Louisiana Senate Bill SCR79

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/13/11

Caption

Directs the Southeast La. Flood Protection Authority-East to limit travel expenses to travel between the residence of a board member and the meeting location, and to prohibit the payment of rental car expenses for a member not domiciled within ninety miles of the meeting location.

Impact

SCR79 aims to enhance the accountability of the public funds utilized by the Southeast Louisiana Flood Protection Authority-East by eliminating excessive travel reimbursements. With reports indicating that some board members have claimed thousands in travel expenses while residing far from the meeting locations, the resolution seeks to ensure that taxpayer money is spent more judiciously. This change could significantly reshape how travel expenses are managed within state bodies, aligning with broader fiscal responsibility goals being pursued in light of budgetary shortfalls.

Summary

Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 79 (SCR79) directs the Southeast Louisiana Flood Protection Authority-East to impose restrictions on travel expenses for its board members. Specifically, the resolution limits expenses only to travel between a board member's permanent residence and the meeting location. Furthermore, it prohibits the reimbursement of rental car expenses for any board member who does not reside within 90 miles of the meeting site. This legislative decision stems from concerns regarding the appropriateness of the significant travel expenses incurred by some members during a time when state funds are dwindling, leading to cuts in critical services such as healthcare and education.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SCR79 appears to be supportive, particularly among fiscally conscious legislators and constituents who advocate for transparency and prudent spending of state funds. The resolution reflects a growing concern about government officials' expenditure habits, especially when state finances are under strain. However, there may be mixed feelings among board members regarding the limitations on expenses that could affect their ability to perform their duties effectively, particularly if they are unable to cover costs themselves.

Contention

While the intent of SCR79 is to curb unnecessary spending, it is important to recognize potential pushback from board members who may feel restricted by these new measures. The prohibition on rental car expenses extends to members living outside the designated radius, which could disproportionately affect those who have legitimate roles that require travel. This aspect of the resolution highlights an ongoing debate about the balance between fiscal constraints and the operational needs of public bodies tasked with essential duties, such as flood protection in Louisiana.