Louisiana House Bill HB13

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12

Caption

Provides relative to service credit in public retirement systems received by part-time public officials

Impact

If enacted, HB 13 would specifically amend existing laws regarding public retirement systems in Louisiana. The bill eliminates the provision that allowed part-time officials, who were serving prior to January 1, 1997, to accrue service credits for their tenure. This change would potentially decrease future retirement benefits for these officials, aligning retirement accrual more accurately with the definitions and roles of part-time service.

Summary

House Bill 13, introduced by Representative Talbot, amends R.S. 11:164(B)(1) to stipulate that certain part-time elected officials will no longer accrue service credit in public retirement systems for their service after December 31, 2012. The bill primarily targets elected and appointed officials categorized as part-time, including legislators, school board members, and city council members. This legislative action aims to clarify the service credit eligibility and limit the retirement benefits that part-time officials receive.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 13 appears to be mixed, as it raises questions regarding the fairness and adequacy of retirement benefits for part-time officials. Supporters of the bill may argue that it is essential to ensure proper management of public funds and that part-time roles should not be treated the same as full-time careers in terms of retirement. Conversely, opponents might highlight the risks of discouraging public service by diminishing the incentive for potential part-time officials who would rely on these retirement benefits.

Contention

Notable contention centers around the implications of restricting service credit for part-time officials. Critics argue that the reduction of potential retirement benefits could disincentivize qualified individuals from serving in public office, thereby affecting the representation and governance quality within local communities. Furthermore, the requirement for the proposed amendment to be effective only upon statewide election adds another layer of complexity and uncertainty regarding its enactment.