Louisiana House Bill HB36

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12

Caption

Appropriates funds to pay claim against the state in "Janet Davis (Cloud) v. Secretary, Department of Revenue, State of Louisiana"

Impact

The enactment of HB36 will directly impact the state's budgetary allocations, ensuring that funds are set aside for resolving legal claims against the state. Such appropriations are typically an essential function of the legislature, reflecting the state’s commitment to uphold legal decisions made by designated authorities like the Board of Tax Appeals. By appropriating the funds as required, the state affirms its obligations and supports the rule of law regarding tax disputes, which may enhance confidence in governmental processes.

Summary

House Bill 36 is a legislative proposal that aims to appropriate funds from the state’s general fund to satisfy a financial obligation resulting from a decision made by the Board of Tax Appeals. The bill specifically allocates a total of $3,458.00 to be paid as a recommendation involving a case titled 'Janet Davis (Cloud) v. Secretary, Department of Revenue, State of Louisiana.' This fund allocation is intended to address a claim against the state and represents a financial responsibility recognized by the state in light of the tax appeal's ruling.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB36 appears to be neutral, as the bill deals primarily with a specific financial transaction regarding a legal ruling. There may not be substantial contention regarding the bill itself since it pertains to an established legal matter, suggesting that both supporters and opponents recognize the necessity of complying with the Board's decision. This bill seems to be perceived as a routine financial obligation rather than a piece of controversial legislation.

Contention

While there does not appear to be significant contention specifically regarding HB36, the broader implications of funding allocations in general can sometimes lead to debates over budgetary priorities. Discussions might arise surrounding how such appropriations affect other state expenditures and whether similar claims could result in larger fiscal impacts in the future. Hence, while this individual bill may not provoke much debate, it does underscore the potential complexities and challenges associated with managing state finances.