Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB974

Introduced
3/12/12  
Refer
3/12/12  
Report Pass
3/15/12  
Engrossed
3/26/12  
Refer
3/27/12  
Report Pass
4/2/12  
Enrolled
4/9/12  
Chaptered
4/18/12  

Caption

Provides relative to teacher tenure, pay-for-performance, and evaluations (EN SEE FISC NOTE LF EX See Note)

Impact

This bill significantly alters the landscape of teacher employment and evaluation. Proponents argue that it will enhance teaching quality by linking job security and financial compensation more directly to performance outcomes. Furthermore, the new evaluation frameworks established under the bill are designed to provide a more comprehensive approach to assessing teacher effectiveness. However, these changes are not without controversy, as many educators and advocacy groups express concerns about the potential negative consequences for teachers who fear dismissal due to a single low evaluation.

Summary

House Bill 974 addresses key aspects of teacher tenure, pay-for-performance, and evaluation criteria across Louisiana's public schools. A major component of this bill includes the stipulation that teachers must serve a probationary period of three years. During this time, teachers can be dismissed based on the recommendation of school administrators, which ensures that only those who meet set standards can achieve tenure. Effective from the 2013-2014 school year, teachers rated as 'ineffective' will lose their tenure immediately, reflecting a stark shift towards accountability in teaching effectiveness.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 974 is mixed. Supporters, primarily from educational reform advocacy groups, view the bill as a crucial step toward modernizing teacher employment practices and ensuring accountability in the education system. They assert that tying salary and job security to performance will drive improvements in student outcomes. Conversely, opponents argue that the focus on performance evaluations may lead to unfair dismissals and discourage talented individuals from entering or remaining in the teaching profession. This conflict underscores the broader debate between maintaining educational quality through rigorous standards and protecting the rights and job security of educators.

Contention

A notable point of contention regarding HB 974 is the allowance for public school boards to dismiss teachers without the traditional protections once granted by tenure. Critics are concerned that this could create an environment of fear among teachers, where job security is heavily reliant on test scores and subjective evaluations, potentially harming educational quality. The debate encapsulates a fundamental tension within public education reform—balancing accountability with the need for a stable and experienced teaching workforce.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

LA HB1277

Provides relative to teacher tenure and the removal of teachers

LA HB1033

Provides relative to evaluation and assessment programs for teachers and administrators (EN SEE FISC NOTE LF EX See Note)

LA SB603

Provides relative to teacher tenure, pay-for-performance, and evaluations. (7/1/12) (EG LF EX See Note)

LA HB650

Provides relative to the organization of the state Department of Education (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX See Note)

LA SB89

Provides relative to tenure for teachers and certain other school employees. (7/1/2013) (OR SEE FISC NOTE LF EX)

LA HB942

Provides relative to the employment of the local public school superintendent and the authority of the superintendent and the school board for personnel matters

LA HB982

Provides relative to the process for discharging, demoting, or disciplining a permanent public school teacher

LA HB987

Provides relative teacher tenure and the removal of teachers