If adopted, the study recommended by HCR13 could lead to significant changes in how peremptory exceptions and claims of immunity are handled within Louisiana's judicial system. Currently, there is a lack of clarity on whether immunity should be formally integrated as a peremptory exception, which could impact the manner in which litigants approach cases involving potential immunity defenses. The resolution implicitly acknowledges the need for a more uniform understanding and application of these legal principles.
Summary
HCR13 is a concurrent resolution urging the Louisiana State Law Institute to conduct a study on the state's existing laws governing peremptory exceptions and immunity. The bill highlights the growing concern regarding how civil liability immunity is applied within Louisiana's legal framework, especially in the context of various entities, including the state, its agencies, or political subdivisions that are granted immunity by law. It recognizes that the inconsistency in court rulings regarding the applicability of immunity in legal procedures necessitates a comprehensive examination.
Sentiment
The sentiment around HCR13 appears to be supportive, as it addresses an important issue in Louisiana's legislative and legal landscape. By requesting a study, the resolution signifies a proactive approach to resolving existing disparities in legal interpretations and processes, indicating a commitment from the legislature to ensure fairness and consistency in the judicial system.
Contention
While HCR13 is largely favorable, it does raise certain points of contention regarding potential recommendations that could emerge from the study. Stakeholders might express varying views on whether the inclusion of immunity as a peremptory exception could affect the rights of individuals seeking justice in cases involving the state or its agencies. The resolution calls for formal recommendations to be reported back to the legislature by January 1, 2013, which will provide an avenue for further legislative action and discussion.
Requests the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education to study the advantages and disadvantages of enacting a law limiting the salary amounts for certain public school administrators to that paid to teachers
Relative to the La. State University Shreveport Commitment Plan as unanimously endorsed by the LSU Board of Supervisors on April 27, 2012, provides legislative findings and for certain reports to the legislature, the legislative education committees, and the Board of Regents for the next three academic years