Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HCR78

Introduced
4/9/12  
Refer
4/10/12  
Refer
4/18/12  
Refer
4/19/12  
Report Pass
5/2/12  
Engrossed
5/14/12  
Refer
5/15/12  
Report Pass
5/23/12  

Caption

Creates a study committee to study the detection and prevention of heart disease in student athletes

Impact

The proposed study committee will be comprised of key stakeholders, including members from the Louisiana High School Athletics Association, cardiovascular physicians, and representatives from health and athletics organizations. By exploring the feasibility of implementing uniform screening methods, such as Electrocardiograms (EKGs) and Echocardiograms, the committee hopes to develop recommendations that can eventually inform policy regarding mandatory health screenings for young athletes. The findings are expected to be reported to the legislature by February 2013, potentially shaping legislation aimed at protecting student health.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution 78 (HCR78) aims to create a study committee dedicated to researching the detection and prevention of heart disease among student athletes. The bill responds to alarming statistics surrounding sudden cardiac arrest, which is notably the leading cause of death for young athletes in the United States. By focusing on preventative methods, such as enhanced screening procedures, HCR78 seeks to address the hidden risks that many student athletes face, particularly those who appear otherwise healthy and active.

Sentiment

General sentiment towards HCR78 is supportive, especially given the tragic deaths associated with undiagnosed heart conditions among young athletes. Advocates for the bill emphasize the importance of early detection methods as a means to save lives. However, there may be challenges regarding the logistics and funding necessary for widespread implementation of screening procedures, which could influence the bill's support among lawmakers and the public alike.

Contention

While there appears to be consensus on the necessity of addressing heart disease in student athletes, debates could arise regarding the specific measures that should be mandated. Opponents of mandatory screenings may express concerns about the potential costs and logistical hurdles associated with establishing such a program. Furthermore, discussions may center on the balance between ensuring athlete safety and maintaining a focus on individual health autonomy, which could lead to contention surrounding the bill's recommendations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.