Louisiana Senate Bill SB102

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12

Caption

Prohibits an unpaid traffic citation that was issued by an automated traffic enforcement system from being sent to a collection agency. (8/1/12)

Impact

If enacted, SB102 will directly affect the procedures surrounding the collection of traffic violations, specifically those involving automated enforcement systems. By prohibiting the forwarding of unpaid citations to collection agencies, the bill aims to diminish the financial pressure on citizens, potentially reducing the number of people who enter debt for minor violations. Furthermore, this change may influence local governments' strategies on compliance and enforcement related to traffic laws, potentially leading to a re-evaluation of fines and penalties tied to automated systems.

Summary

Senate Bill 102 seeks to amend Louisiana state laws regarding traffic violations specifically issued by automated traffic enforcement systems. The bill prohibits any unpaid traffic citation issued via these systems from being forwarded to a collection agency for debt collection purposes. This legislation aims to provide greater consumer protection and alleviate the financial burdens on individuals who may be unable to pay their traffic citations promptly. The enforcement of this bill could alter how municipalities manage and pursue unpaid traffic violations, emphasizing a move towards more consumer-friendly practices.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB102 appears to be supportive, particularly among advocates for consumer protection who argue that the bill is a necessary measure to prevent undue financial strain on citizens. Proponents of the bill believe that it is a step in the right direction for upholding the rights of consumers against aggressive collection practices. On the other hand, some law enforcement and local government representatives may express concerns that limiting the collection strategies available to municipalities could hamper their ability to enforce traffic laws effectively.

Contention

Notably, while the bill is positioned as a protective measure for consumers, there may be contention around its potential implications for traffic law enforcement. Local governments could argue that losing the ability to send citations to collections limits their capacity to compel compliance and recover municipal revenue that supports public services. This debate highlights the tension between consumer rights and law enforcement efficiency, suggesting further discussions may be necessary to balance these interests in the legislative process.