Louisiana Senate Bill SB249

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 4/16/12
• Engrossed: 4/18/12
• Refer: 4/19/12
• Report Pass: 5/2/12
• Enrolled: 5/23/12
• Chaptered: 5/31/12
• Passed: 5/31/12

Caption

Re-creates the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries. (6/30/12)

Impact

With an effective date set for June 30, 2012, and a phased-out authority timeline culminating on July 1, 2017, SB249 underscores the ongoing commitment of the state to maintain its foundational environmental governance. The Department will have the statutory endorsement it needs to uphold its initiatives for wildlife conservation and management. However, the looming 2017 termination date creates scrutiny on the department's long-term viability and ultimately relies on further legislative action to revive its authority before that deadline.

Summary

Senate Bill 249, known for re-creating the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries in Louisiana, is significant as it provides a legislative framework to sustain the existence and operations of this vital department. Established to manage and conserve the state’s wildlife and fishery resources, the bill ensures that the department continues to function effectively under the authority provided by the state legislature. Notably, the bill also addresses the statutory entities associated with the Department, reaffirming their relevance and operational stability moving forward.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB249 is generally positive, given its supportive focus on state wildlife management and conservation. Lawmakers expressed a consensus concerning the importance of a dedicated body to oversee these critical ecological responsibilities. The unanimous vote (95-0) in the House during final passage reflects a cross-party agreement on the necessity and functionality of the Department's governance, emphasizing its crucial role in local ecological health and resource management.

Contention

While the bill largely received unanimous support, concerns may arise regarding the approach and implications of the termination timeline. If the Department is not re-created before mid-2017, it could result in a gap in regulatory authority, potentially endangering wildlife and fish resources. This presents a critical focal point for advocates of wildlife protection, who highlight the need for ongoing legislative oversight and support to prevent reverting from active management to an uncertain regulatory future, which could harm both ecological and economic interests.