Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB389

Introduced
3/12/12  
Refer
3/12/12  
Report Pass
4/18/12  
Engrossed
4/25/12  
Refer
4/26/12  
Report Pass
5/14/12  
Enrolled
5/30/12  
Chaptered
6/7/12  

Caption

Requires the attorney general to regulate sweepstakes promotions and provides certain requirements and procedures. (8/1/12)

Impact

The introduction of SB 389 is expected to significantly impact the legal landscape governing promotional contests. It seeks to standardize how sweepstakes are conducted, providing specific guidelines on how winners should be notified. For example, winners can be revealed through various means, including printed lists or direct communication. This regulation aims to protect consumers from potential fraud or deceptive practices associated with sweepstakes, enhancing accountability in advertising and promotions.

Summary

Senate Bill 389 aims to regulate sweepstakes promotions within the state of Louisiana. By enacting new statutes under R.S. 51:1726 and 1727, the bill establishes a framework for the oversight of sweepstakes, ensuring that promotions are conducted fairly and transparently. The attorney general's office is designated as the regulatory body, tasked with enforcing compliance among entities conducting sweepstakes. Key definitions related to contests and games have been outlined to clarify what falls under the purview of this legislation.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 389 appears to be generally supportive among legislators, as evidenced by the unanimous vote in favor of the bill in the Senate, with 37 votes for and none against it. The legislation is positioned as a necessary measure to address the growing concerns related to the integrity of sweepstakes promotions, indicating a shared belief in the importance of having robust legal protections for participants. However, as with any regulatory proposal, there may be dissent from those who view additional regulations as cumbersome or unnecessary.

Contention

While SB 389 primarily focuses on a regulatory framework, potential points of contention may arise from the definition of what constitutes a sweepstakes promotion and the involvement of the attorney general's office in overseeing these activities. Concerns could be raised regarding the balance between consumer protection and the operational freedoms of businesses that conduct sweepstakes, especially those that may have been operating without stringent regulatory oversight. Stakeholder feedback during future discussions will likely illuminate these aspects.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

LA HB293

Prohibits gambling by electronic sweepstakes device (EN INCREASE GF EX See Note)

LA SB311

Prohibits gambling by electronic sweepstakes device. (8/1/14)

CA AB1033

Sexual battery: condoms.

LA SR130

Requests the attorney general to review applicable gaming laws and make a report to the Senate Committee on Judiciary B on the legality of "Internet sweepstakes".

CT SB00080

An Act Prohibiting Internet Sweepstakes Cafes.

NJ S4109

Designates sweepstakes casinos as internet gaming; requires licensure, oversight, and taxation thereof within internet gaming framework.

NJ A5196

Designates sweepstakes casinos as internet gaming; requires licensure, oversight, and taxation thereof within internet gaming framework.

CT SB00102

An Act Prohibiting Internet Sweepstakes Cafes.