Prohibits gambling by electronic sweepstakes device. (8/1/14)
The passage of SB 311 would significantly impact laws relating to gambling in Louisiana by establishing strict definitions and penalties associated with electronic sweepstakes gambling. The law sets a maximum fine of $20,000 and potential imprisonment of up to five years for offenders engaging in prohibited practices. It aims to enhance consumer protection and integrity in gaming, aligning the state's gambling laws with contemporary challenges posed by new technology in the gambling sector. The bill retains existing laws governing standard gambling activities but aims to expand on them to address the emergence of electronic gaming operations.
Senate Bill 311 introduces provisions to prohibit gambling conducted through electronic sweepstakes devices in Louisiana. The bill identifies and criminalizes the act of operating gaming machines or devices that offer games, contests, or sweepstakes involving a risk of losing something of value in hopes of a profit. This measure aims to close loopholes currently exploited by companies using electronic machines for gambling-like activities, which are deemed contrary to state law and public policy. The bill defines electronic sweepstakes gambling operations clearly, addressing various types of gaming devices and their functionalities.
The sentiment surrounding SB 311 appears to be largely supportive among lawmakers focusing on curtailing illicit forms of gambling while protecting consumers and state gaming revenue. Proponents argue that regulating electronic sweepstakes prevents exploitation and ensures fair play standards are upheld. However, there are concerns from certain groups that the bill may overreach by criminalizing forms of gaming that have both recreational and revenue-generating potential, raising questions about personal liberties and economic implications for establishments utilizing these devices.
Key points of contention regarding SB 311 include the balance between regulation and the potential limitations imposed on businesses that rely on electronic sweepstakes as part of their operations. There is a debate over the extent of the law's reach, particularly concerning existing forms of legal gaming. Additionally, while the bill provides exceptions for approved forms of gaming, critics worry that it could stifle innovation in the gaming market or unintentionally limit popular services offered by businesses under the guise of protecting public interests.