Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB532

Introduced
3/12/12  
Refer
3/12/12  

Caption

Provides for certain requirements for use of ground water from the Chicot Aquifer. (8/1/12)

Impact

This bill significantly alters the landscape of environmental regulation in regard to groundwater management in Louisiana. By instituting stricter controls and requiring thorough environmental assessments, it aims to safeguard the Chicot Aquifer from overexploitation. However, it also seeks to balance economic activities involving water use by outlining specific scenarios in which permits can still be issued, positioning itself as a pivotal regulatory framework for both environmental protection and economic interests related to hydrocarbon extraction and water use.

Summary

Senate Bill 532, introduced by Senator Mills, addresses the regulation of groundwater usage from the Chicot Aquifer, specifically imposing stringent requirements on permits for certain water withdrawals. The bill mandates that the commissioner of conservation must not authorize any usage of three million gallons or more of groundwater per day for subsurface injection in specified parishes. It also establishes conditions under which permits for hydrocarbon storage and brine extraction can be granted, requiring a comprehensive environmental impact statement from applicants, which will involve detailing potential environmental consequences and engaging relevant state or federal agencies for their input.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB532 is generally supportive among environmental groups and conservationists who see it as a proactive step toward protecting vital water resources. However, there may be concerns from industries reliant on large volumes of water for operations, reflecting a tension between economic activities and environmental preservation. Discussions surrounding the bill hint at cautious optimism, with stakeholders recognizing the need for sustainable management of water resources while also expressing apprehension about potential impacts on industrial operations dependent on groundwater.

Contention

Notably, the bill introduces points of contention regarding the balance of regulatory authority and industry needs. While proponents argue it is necessary for environmental sustainability, critics, particularly from industrial sectors, may view the permit requirements as overly burdensome. This has led to discussions on the adequacy of resource management practices, the role of governmental oversight in water usage, and whether these new regulations could potentially lead to economic drawbacks for businesses dependent on water-intensive processes.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT SB00218

An Act Concerning Brownfield Remediation.

NJ S1947

Provides tax credit under corporation business tax and gross income tax for certain costs incurred in purchase and installation of certain environmentally responsible business equipment.

CT SB01038

An Act Concerning Brownfield Remediation.

CT HB05342

An Act Concerning Revisions To The State's Brownfield Remediation And Development Statutes.

MN HF2569

Coordinated plans to complete environmental review and other state agency actions provided, and reports required.

MN SF2324

Coordinated plans provision to complete environmental review and other state agency actions

MN SF876

Metallic mineral mining projects environmental review and permitting process modifications

MN HF1467

Coordination, effectiveness, transparency, and accountability of environmental review and permitting process for metallic mineral mining projects improved.