Louisiana Senate Bill SB708

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/3/12
• Refer: 4/3/12
• Report Pass: 4/18/12
• Engrossed: 4/25/12
• Refer: 4/26/12
• Report Pass: 5/16/12
• Enrolled: 6/1/12
• Chaptered: 6/7/12
• Passed: 6/7/12

Caption

Requires that notice and election form be provided to, the fetal heartbeat be made audible to, and ultrasound images be displayed for review by, a pregnant woman prior to an abortion. (8/1/12)

Impact

The bill modifies Louisiana's existing abortion statutes, aligning them with certain provisions upheld in Texas related to ultrasound requirements. It establishes new requirements that physicians must follow, emphasizing the importance of displaying ultrasound results and fetal heart activity as part of obtaining informed consent. Notably, it specifies exemptions for victims of rape or incest, allowing them to opt out of certain information provisions. Additionally, non-compliance with the bill's requirements could result in civil penalties and professional disciplinary action against the providers.

Summary

Senate Bill 708 (SB708) aims to enhance the informed consent process for women seeking abortions in Louisiana by mandating the performance of an obstetric ultrasound at least 24 hours prior to the procedure. This ultrasound must include displaying the images, making the fetal heartbeat audible, and providing a verbal explanation of the ultrasound’s results. The bill's intent is to ensure that women are fully informed about the pregnancy, including its gestational age and number of unborn children, which advocates argue supports informed decision-making around the option of abortion.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB708 is deeply divided along political and ideological lines. Supporters, primarily from the Republican party, advocate for the bill as a necessary step toward safeguarding fetal rights and enhancing women's understanding of their pregnancies. In contrast, opponents, including various Democratic lawmakers and women's rights groups, argue that the bill undermines a woman's autonomy and imposes unnecessary mental and emotional distress during a highly sensitive time. The debate reflects broader national discussions on reproductive rights and the role of the state in personal healthcare decisions.

Contention

Key points of contention revolve around the mandatory ultrasound and its implications. Critics argue that forcing women to view images of the fetus and hear the heartbeat can be emotionally coercive and may deter some women from pursuing the abortion. Furthermore, the legislation raises concerns about medical autonomy and the qualifications of individuals performing ultrasounds. The bill's linkage to previous legal decisions, particularly from Texas, has also drawn scrutiny regarding its effectiveness and adherence to constitutional protections for abortion rights.