Louisiana House Bill HCR169

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/29/13
• Engrossed: 5/30/13
• Passed: 6/2/13

Caption

Requests governing authorities of public secondary schools to offer for credit an elective course that teaches the curriculum of Future Leaders of America's Gulf (F.L.A.G.)

Impact

The primary impact of HCR169 on state laws is its focus on expanding educational offerings in public secondary schools to include courses that highlight environmental issues and community responsibilities. By implementing the F.L.A.G. curriculum, schools would play a significant role in shaping informed citizens who are aware of local challenges, particularly concerning the preservation of Louisiana's coastal wetlands. The resolution serves as a mandate for the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education to ensure that its message is transmitted to local education governing bodies, promoting statewide adoption.

Summary

HCR169 is a House Concurrent Resolution that urges and requests governing authorities of public secondary schools in Louisiana to offer for credit an elective course on Future Leaders of America's Gulf (F.L.A.G.). The bill emphasizes the importance of educating high school students about the socio-economic and environmental challenges facing the Louisiana Gulf Coast. It aims to engage youth in investigation and reporting on pertinent issues impacting their community, thus fostering a sense of responsibility and leadership among future generations.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HCR169 appears to be positive, with strong support from various stakeholders who see the value in teaching students about environmental stewardship and leadership. The resolution is likely to garner broad support as it aligns with educational goals aimed at fostering civic engagement and addressing critical environmental issues. However, it may encounter some opposition from those who prioritize other curricular areas or are skeptical about additional required educational initiatives.

Contention

Despite its positive intention, some points of contention may arise regarding the appropriateness of mandating such courses in public schools. Critics may argue about the potential impact on existing curricula and whether the schools have the necessary resources to implement the F.L.A.G. program effectively. There may also be discussions about the balance between local autonomy in education and state involvement in curriculum decisions, with concerns regarding the sufficiency of local input in determining the educational needs of students.