Louisiana House Bill HB231

Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/14
• Refer: 3/10/14
• Report Pass: 3/18/14
• Engrossed: 3/31/14
• Refer: 4/1/14

Caption

Re-creates the Department of Public Service

Impact

The impact of HB 231 is significant as it extends the operational timeline for the Department of Public Service, giving it a mandate to continue its functions, which include oversight and regulation in sectors vital to public welfare. This legislative action not only consolidates existing regulatory structures but also provides clarity on the authority of the Department amidst the uncertainties introduced by sunset laws. The bill is positioned as a necessity for maintaining continuity in governance and the regulatory landscape.

Summary

House Bill 231 aims to re-create the Department of Public Service and ensure its continued authority beyond the predetermined sunset provisions. The legislation specifically addresses the expiration of the Department's operations, which was set to begin in 2014 under previous law. By providing for the re-creation of the Department and its associated statutory entities, the bill seeks to stabilize the regulatory framework under which these entities operate, extending their existence until July 1, 2019, unless further actions are taken by the legislature.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 231 can be characterized as generally supportive, particularly among legislators who recognize the importance of maintaining a functioning Department of Public Service. The unanimous approval (92-0) in the House reflects a broad agreement on the necessity of the bill, indicating that there are few, if any, substantial objections among lawmakers regarding its provisions. This collective support suggests that the bill is fundamental in ensuring effective public service management.

Contention

While there appears to be widespread agreement on the need to re-create the Department of Public Service, discussions may involve considerations about the broader implications of sunset laws and the balance of power between legislative oversight and regulatory autonomy. Any contention surrounding the bill likely originated from debates on the effectiveness and accountability of statutory entities, emphasizing the importance of periodic review and public accountability in government operations.