Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB622

Introduced
3/10/14  
Introduced
3/10/14  
Refer
3/10/14  
Refer
3/10/14  
Report Pass
3/17/14  
Report Pass
3/17/14  
Engrossed
3/26/14  
Engrossed
3/26/14  
Refer
3/31/14  
Refer
3/31/14  
Report Pass
4/29/14  
Report Pass
4/29/14  
Enrolled
5/14/14  
Enrolled
5/14/14  
Chaptered
5/22/14  
Chaptered
5/22/14  
Passed
5/22/14  

Caption

Provides relative to tutorship proceedings (EN NO IMPACT See Note)

Impact

The impact of HB 622 is significant as it modifies the legal framework governing tutorship and property rights for minors in Louisiana. By specifying that certificates without requisite financial values do not constitute a legal mortgage, the bill intends to protect minors from potential legal vulnerabilities. This change might also streamline processes related to tutorship, as it clarifies the requirements for certificate recording, making it easier to distinguish valid legal claims from those that lack appropriate backing.

Summary

House Bill 622 addresses provisions related to tutorship proceedings in Louisiana. It amends the existing Code of Civil Procedure, specifically Article 4134, to clarify the legal implications of recording certificates of mortgages concerning minors. The key change is that a certificate recorded for the amount of zero dollars will not create a legal mortgage. This aims to eliminate confusion around the effect of such certificates and safeguard the rights of minors involved in tutorship arrangements.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 622 appears to be generally positive, particularly among legal professionals and advocates for child welfare. The clarity provided by the amendments is seen as a beneficial step towards improving the legal processes affecting minors. As the bill passes with unanimous support in voting, it reflects a consensus on the necessity of these amendments, indicating a shared commitment to safeguarding minors' interests in legal proceedings.

Contention

While the bill received unanimous support, the specific implications of the changes could lead to contention in practical scenarios. Some stakeholders may argue about the necessity and the effects of further refining the tutorship process, especially regarding financial implications. However, as presented, the amendment primarily aims to provide clearer guidelines rather than introducing contentious new regulations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.