Applies to congress under U.S. Const. Art. V to call a convention of the states to propose U.S. constitutional amendments to impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit federal government power, and provide for term limits for federal officials and members of congress
The adoption of HCR15 could have significant implications for state laws and federal dynamics. By seeking a convention to propose constitutional amendments, Louisiana joins a growing movement among states that feel the need to tighten constraints on federal power. Should sufficient states participate, the resulting amendments could alter the relationship between state and federal authority, enhancing state sovereignty while potentially reshaping the structure of federal governance regarding budgetary matters and the tenure of elected officials.
HCR15 is a concurrent resolution from the Louisiana Legislature that formally requests the U.S. Congress to call a convention of the states under Article V of the U.S. Constitution. The resolution specifically seeks to propose amendments that would impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit its power and jurisdiction, and establish term limits for federal officials and members of Congress. By advocating for these changes, the resolution aims to address concerns regarding federal overreach and fiscal responsibility.
The sentiment surrounding HCR15 appears to be supportive among many in the Louisiana Legislature, particularly among those who advocate for greater state control over governance and fiscal matters. Supporters of the measure view it as a necessary step toward reigning in excessive federal power, while critics may express concerns about the unpredictability and risks associated with a constitutional convention, fearing that such a gathering could lead to unintended alterations to the Constitution's foundational principles.
A primary contention regarding HCR15 lies in its potential consequences and the validity of calling a convention for the purpose outlined. Opponents raise alarms about the risks associated with opening the Constitution for amendment, fearing that it may lead to broader changes beyond fiscal restraints and term limits. These concerns revolve around the difficulty in controlling the agenda of a constitutional convention and the potential for amendments that could undermine established rights or protections.