Applies to congress to call a convention of the states limited to proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution that impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limit terms of office for U.S. officials and for members of congress
If passed, HCR6 may lead to significant changes in federal authority by potentially shifting the balance of power towards states. The implications of such changes could be broad, affecting various forms of governance and fiscal policies at the national level. Advocates argue that these amendments could restore fiscal responsibility and limit government overreach, thereby empowering states and localities. Such shifts also prompt discussions on how they would affect individual rights, state regulations, and the relationship between state and federal legislation.
House Concurrent Resolution 6 (HCR6) proposes an application to the United States Congress to call a convention of the states aimed at proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution. The proposed amendments would impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit its power and jurisdiction, and set term limits for federal officials and members of Congress. This resolution is rooted in Article V of the U.S. Constitution, which allows for such a convention upon the application of two-thirds of the states. The resolution highlights the desire of the Louisiana Legislature to address concerns regarding federal overreach.
The sentiment surrounding HCR6 appears to be mixed. Supporters view the initiative as a necessary step to counteract perceived federal overreach and to ensure financial accountability from the federal government. Critics, however, express concern that a convention could lead to unintended consequences, such as the loss of established rights or drastic reductions in governmental powers that protect citizens. This debate reflects broader political divisions around the size and role of government in everyday life.
Key points of contention involve the risks associated with calling a constitutional convention, including the potential for a 'runaway convention' that could result in amendments far beyond those intended. There are fears that the convention could be exploited by groups with extreme views that aim to alter the Constitution in ways that could undermine rights and protections currently in place. As states weigh the implications of HCR6, discussions center on questions of governance, representation, and the fundamental structure of federalism in the United States.