Provides for medical parole for offenders upon the referral of the Department of Public Safety and Corrections. (8/1/14)
Impact
If enacted, SB205 would significantly alter the landscape of parole in Louisiana by providing clearer pathways for inmates convicted of violent crimes. The bill establishes eligibility criteria that require offenders to complete various rehabilitation and educational programs, including pre-release programming, substance abuse treatment, and obtaining a GED or equivalent credential. Additionally, it proposes a transitional parole supervision program, aimed at safeguarding community interests whilst facilitating the reintegration of offenders who have demonstrated compliance during their incarceration.
Summary
Senate Bill 205, proposed by Senator Guillory, aims to amend the existing laws regarding parole eligibility, particularly for individuals convicted of violent crimes. The bill lowers the time that first-time violent offenders must serve before being eligible for parole from 85% to 65% of their sentence, and for second-time offenders, from 85% to 75%. This legislative change is intended to promote rehabilitation and reintegration into society, aligning with growing sentiments towards more lenient parole policies.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB205 reflects a mixed response. Proponents argue that the bill fosters a more humane approach to justice, enabling reform for offenders who meet specific qualifications and have shown good behavior. However, critics express concern over the potential risks posed by lowering parole eligibility criteria for violent offenders, fearing implications for public safety and the message it sends regarding accountability for violent crimes.
Contention
A notable point of contention in the discussions around SB205 includes the proposal for medical parole, which allows offenders suffering from significant health issues to be considered for parole regardless of their crime severity, provided they meet certain criteria. This has spurred debates over the balance between compassion for health-compromised offenders and the interests of maintaining safety standards for the public. Additionally, the requirement for electronic monitoring and the provision stressing compliance with rehabilitation efforts are intended to mitigate these concerns, though they also reflect broader discussions on the efficacy and ethics of parole systems.